In the lending/appraisal world there is something called a “Drive-by” or “exterior only” appraisal. These are performed on a 2055 FNMA form and have a scope of work that is limited to an inspection “from the street” only. According to the scope of work, the appraiser then assumes that the interior is consistent with the exterior of the home (in condition and quality).
There are times where these are needed - pre-foreclosure is the most common need. The bank can’t gain access to the home, but needs to know the value of the home to make financial decisions.
“REFINANCE, much less a FULL REFINANCE should NEVER be performed based on an exterior-only report. You are asking to go under water if you allow your bank to do this to save $100.”
We can not say this strongly enough. Please, ask your bank what kind of appraisal they are ordering, and demand a full appraisal to save yourself thousands. We ran across a case recently that illustrates the dangers of using the wrong type of appraisal:
In 2016 we performed an exterior-only appraisal for a lender. The home had been fully updated on the exterior. We were asked to not contact the homeowner in the engagement letter. Therefore we complied with the required scope of work and appraised the home under the hypothetical condition that the interior matched the exterior. The final opinion of value was $105,000.
The bank then made a loan on the property based on a 90% loan to value ratio: $94,500.
Now in 2019, we were asked to perform a full appraisal on the home. The exterior is still in very good shape… but stepping through the front door is a journey back in time. Well maintained, but nothing updated since the 1970s. The value of the home now: $85,000. After three years of mortgage payments, the homeowner is now $3,000 in the hole.
How did this happen, did we perform a bad report? We immediately double-checked our work and found that the report was a credible appraisal of what we were asked to appraise. However, the lender should NEVER have been allowed to write that loan based on that appraisal (that’s a FNMA, federal lending regulations issue).
We close this blog with a warning from the past about the cost of liberty. We might insert the phrase “financial liberty,” here to emphasize our point. The borrower must educate themselves about the loan process in order to not be taken advantage of by those whose financial interest is not concerned in the slightest with their own. We write these blogs for anyone involved in real estate in hopes that a more educated populace with lead to a more financially free populace.
